Explores the philosophical problem of the identity of indiscernibles, which asks whether two objects that are indiscernible in all respects are necessarily identical.
Presents two arguments against the identity of indiscernibles: the argument from vagueness and the argument from change.
Defends the view that the identity of indiscernibles is false, and argues that this has implications for our understanding of objects, properties, and change.
Written in a clear and accessible style, making it suitable for both philosophers and non-philosophers alike.
* Provides a comprehensive overview of the debate over the identity of indiscernibles, and offers a novel perspective on this classic philosophical problem.